A Contentious Call: Udinese’s Equalizer Sparks Debate
The 1-1 draw between AC Milan and Udinese at San Siro was marred by controversy surrounding the Friulian side’s equalizer. Did Udogie use his arm to redirect the ball into the net, or was it simply an unfortunate deflection off Romagnoli? While the available footage strongly suggests an irregular touch by the Udinese player, the VAR (guide) ultimately decided against overturning the goal.
This wasn’t the only instance where referee Marchetti’s decisions raised eyebrows. Earlier in the match, he opted against awarding Milan an advantage at the 17th minute, a call reminiscent of the controversial “Serra style” officiating. Furthermore, Marchetti swiftly issued a yellow card to Perez, a decision that seemed hasty.
Adding to the frustration for Milan supporters was a missed call in the second half. A negligent challenge by tomori on Beto, originating outside the penalty area, went unpunished. While this incident fell outside the purview of VAR, many believe a foul should have been awarded.
Despite the controversy, Milan did manage to take the lead through Leao’s strike. However,the goal was preceded by two questionable “waving” motions,first from Becao during the build-up.
Teh Udinese Draw: A Case of Controversy?
AC Milan and Udinese played out a contentious 1-1 draw at San Siro, with the result overshadowed by debate surrounding Udinese’s equalizer. Today we’re joined by former Serie A midfielder and ESPN pundit, Marco Tardelli, to unpack the key moments of this controversial match.
Marco, thanks for joining us. the big talking point, naturally, is Udinese’s equalizer. Many believe Udogie used his arm to guide theball into the net. What’s your take,did he handball it?
Marco Tardelli: “It certainly looked suspicious,didn’t it? From the replays,it seems his arm was in an unnatural position and the ball made contact.VAR is there for these exact situations, and frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t overturn the goal. It’s a tough call, but for me, it was handball, plain and simple.”
Do you think referee Marchetti was influenced by the “Serra style” of officiating, where advantage is rarely given? There was an incident early on where Milan could have benefited from an advantage but wasn’t granted one.
MT: “That’s a point many are making, and it’s one we’ve seen before in Serie A. Some referees seem reluctant to let the play flow and are too quick to blow the whistle.It creates a stop-start game which isn’t good for anyone. In that specific situation, the advantage could have been played, but perhaps Marchetti felt the foul was too blatant.”
Milan fans were also incensed by the missed call on Tomori’s challenge on Beto. Outside the penalty area, but a challenge nonetheless. Should that have been a foul?
MT: “Looking at it, I think it’s a foul.Tomori was late with his challenge and there wasn’t much attempt to play the ball. It wasn’t a blatant foul, but given the context of the game with tensions already high, I think a free-kick would have been the right call.”
So, multiple controversial calls went against Milan. Do you think the result ultimately flattered Udinese?
MT: “It’s hard to say definitively. Udinese played well and deserved a goal, but the manner of the equalizer – amidst all the controversy – leaves a sour taste. These kinds of calls can have a significant impact on the outcome of a game, and it’s something that needs to be addressed.
Engaging point, Marco. Before we wrap up, what’s your message to football fans who are increasingly frustrated with these types of officiating errors?
MT: “Fans deserve better.We need clearer guidelines, better VAR implementation, and referees who are consistent in their decision-making. The gorgeous game shouldn’t be marred by questionable calls that leave everyone arguing. We need to work towards a fairer and more transparent officiating system.“
Thanks for your candor, Marco. Let us no your thoughts, fans. Were Udinese lucky to escape with a point? Was Marchetti’s performance acceptable? Leave your comments below – we want to hear your take!**
