El Bara ended up at Cornell-El Prat with Dembl, Adama Traor, Ferran Torres, Aubameyang and Luuk de Jong. He did it from the 88th minute, losing 2-1 in a derby away from home, and without enough time to play anything other than hanging balls in the area. He basically did what any football coach would have done in that situation: desperately wanted to score.
Now it turns out that Xavi n
or you can bet on the direct game when there is no longer time for the elaboration
and there is no other choice but to hold on to the heroic. If he abuses the combination game and control football, he bets on long possessions and the ball to the ground, bad for not knowing how to play something else and adapting to the new times. If, on the other hand, he opts in certain phases of the game to put two extremes to the lime and put in centers so that the forwards finish off, also wrong for betraying his style and advocating direct football that, legend says, he despised at other times. . There are people who really want Xavi. It’s that simple.
The figure of the now Barça coach does not support a middle term. Forces to apply in one of the two extremes
, as it happens in so many other things today in the world of football. There are no grays. And that fuels the conflict. Not even Xavi is going to get Bara to play like in Guardiola’s time, because he doesn’t have the players for it and surely this time won’t be as effective, nor is he going to betray himself by playing the last ten minutes of a game that he is losing. with forwards conducive to putting balls into the area.
Luuk De Jong’s goal is almost worse than if Bara had lost at Cornell-El Prat
. Al Bara should be prohibited from finishing with a header. Those conclusions draws one of some comments with bad drool.
Some were waiting for him since his time as a player and intend to pass the bill that they could not then
. Now, with a Bara under construction, he is an easy target. Anything short of winning with 80% possession will put you on target. As ridiculous as it sounds.
